
The evolution of UK national heritage and scientific institutions demonstrates a structural shift in how collections are preserved, digitised and researched.
Historic, central London estates — while culturally iconic — were not designed for the environmental, technological and spatial demands of 21st-century collections science.
Thames Valley Science Park (TVSP), owned and developed by the University of Reading, has emerged as a strategic site for this next phase of institutional infrastructure.
This case study examines three major institutions whose TVSP projects collectivally position the park as a national collections and research hub:
Across all three institutions, the pattern is clear. The British Museum has already delivered its TVSP through BM_ARC, supporting archaeological research and storage. The Natural History Museum has planning approval in place for a biodiversity and digitisation centre, reflecting its future scientific and collections strategy. Meanwhile, Kew Gardens has identified a preferred site focused on advancing herbarium facilities and botanical research.
TVSP is emerging as:
- A national collections infrastructure campus
- A decentralised research extension of London institutions
- A science-led preservation hub
- A 50–100-year institutional expansion platform
This is not speculative growth — it is evidenced by:
- Delivered Phase 1 (British Museum)
- Approved planning (Natural History Museum)
- Public engagement & project development (Kew)


Thames Valley Science Park represents a structural evolution in UK institutional strategy:
Historic estates remain cultural anchors.
Scientific infrastructure migrates to scalable research campuses.
The convergence of:
- British Museum
- Natural History Museum
- Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Establishes TVSP as one of the UK’s most significant emerging national collections and research hubs.